Ameristar casino kansas city applications

broken image

The Court also DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Doc. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED.

broken image

Now before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(4)–(6) and 41 (Doc. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC (“Ameristar”) improperly escorted him off its premises in December 2017 after mistaking his impaired, disability-related movements for intoxication. 4:19-CV-01009-DGK ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS This case concerns Plaintiff Garrett Loomis’ claim of disability discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act (“MHRA”). AMERISTAR CASINO KANSAS CITY, LLC, et al., Defendants. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GARRETT LOOMIS, Plaintiff, v.

broken image